5 Places in India I Wish Photography was Allowed
Last
week, a friend of mine wrote an article on Mysore, India and that article
brought back some bitter sweet memories of the place. While I absolutely loved
the town, I did have a bit of bad experience while exploring Mysore Palace
because even though photography is prohibited there, I just couldn’t resist
clicking pictures of the interiors the beautiful palace and an official tracked
me down due to CC TV footage and, very rudely, deleted the 3 pictures I had
taken of the peacock room. That article and this memory is the reason behind
todays' article. Here are five places in India where I wish photography was
allowed – mostly for the place itself – and where banning photography makes
absolutely no sense.
Source |
1. Mysore Palace, Karnataka
The majestic palace and the quirky, colourful and
symmetric interiors of the palace are a delight for any photographer. Even
after paying an entry fee to explore the palace, to not get a chance to click
the interiors is a shame. Of all the places I would list in this article, Mysore
palace was the only one where I couldn’t resist breaking the rule and clicking
some pictures because the corridors are that brilliant. And to have something
that amazing in India and not promote the actual beauty of the place didn’t
make sense to me at all. Nor are the colours photosensitive, nor is the place
jewelled heavily throughout, then why would you restrict photography inside the
palace, especially the corridors? What exactly are they hiding or protecting?
This question has puzzled me for quite some time but no answer has made sense
to me till date.
Source |
2. Dilwara Temples, Rajasthan
Have you seen Ranakpur temple? If not, no worries, if
yes – imagine an older, grander and more detailed version of it. That is
Dilwara. Exquisite, delicate, intricate carvings with white marble. between the
11th and 13th centuries AD, Dilwara temples’ complex, in Mount Abu, is a one of
its kind gem of Indian architecture. The detailing in every part of the temples
– roof, pillars, statues – everything will leave you spellbound and make you
wonder how much hard work and dedication has gone into making them. But all the
work is for your eyes only and the amazement a fading memory after the visit.
Photography is strictly prohibited in the complex. You get postcards and
printed photos of the entire complex outside the area, where you can buy them
to strengthen your memory, but you just can’t click pictures. Apparently
photography here was permitted till late 90’s but not anymore. Does the photography restriction make sense to
you now? It never made sense to me! The temples have Islamic domed roofs –
extremely ordinary looking, to save them from Muslim invaders attacks back in
time. They were threatened at some point in the history? Are they still in
danger? Maybe yes, of vanishing in pages of time, because surprisingly a lot of
people don’t even know about them still. Wont photography help in such crisis?
Source |
3. Kalahasti Temple, Tamil Nadu
Okay agreed, South India has crazy number of
restrictions in almost all its temples; many have the photography restriction
too, and people don’t question them. Then why was I disappointed with Kalahasti
having a photography ban? Because it made no sense. The temple is old and grand
and not very well known. From outside it is almost lost in the main road thanks
to the long stretch of shops selling temple stuff. But when I entered the temple,
I was pleasantly surprised by the clear carving on black stone and the
spacious, thought for layout of the temple. Similar to Kanchipuram temple –
where photography is allowed in the corridors, Kalahasti also is a
photogragher’s paradise, but alas – no photos! I am not saying allow us to
click the deity, but just the place, so that people know of this wonderful
place and make an effort to visit it while visiting Tirupathi temple.
4. Chattia Jagannath Temple, Odisha
Okay, seriously I feel Odisha Tourism needs to do
something around photography restriction that is there almost everywhere in
Odisha. Unless it manages to do something, no matter the number of campaigns,
tourism wont thrive! Anyhow, this particular temple – have you even heard of
it? What if I tell you this is the oldest Kalki Avatar (the last avatar of Lord
Vishnu) Temple in India and that it is the most important Jagannath Temple in
Odisha after the main Jagannath Temple in Puri. Surprised? The temple itself,
though is very old, is repainted every two years and kept as new as possible.
The roofs and the walls of the temple have stories of all the tem avatars of
Lord Vishnu in traditional painting style (the one you would find on
Patachittra). The temple is also easy to find as it is just off the highway
near Jajpur (Close to Cuttack, Odisha). But guess what even after all this, the
place is not known to many other than the locals. Wouldn’t photography help
bring the place some much needed limelight? Weirdest part about the temple, I
was allowed to click pics of whatever I could see from just outside the gate.
The guard actually told me – “Click from there. If you step even an inch inside
the premises of the temple I will break your camera.” You get the
disappointment now, right?
Source |
5. Akshardham Temple, Gujarat
Not allowing photography in the main shrine makes
complete sense, anywhere – but what about around the place? Akshardham of
Ghandhinagar, Gujarat is one of the most brilliant modern temple structures I
have seen till date, but Unfortunately have no pictures of the area, because
well photography is prohibited. I guess the photography ban in the area was
imposed after the terrorist attacks on the temple, not really sure about it.
But whatever maybe the reason – not being able to keep a physical memory of the
place in form of a picture was heart breaking.
Have
you been to some place where photography was prohibited and it just broke your
heart or got to your nerves? Let me know in the comments below.
Yes, I have heard that Dilwara temples does not allow pics and I too, would want it to be allowed :( Even Meenakshi temple is another place where I wish it was allowed. Only mobile pics are allowd.
ReplyDeleteI didnt know of photography not being allowed in Meenakshi Temple...but atleast they let you take the cellphone. Wish it was allowed in Dilwara.
DeleteI am happy that my post made you pen down your valid thoughts on some baseless rules in our country. The Mysore palace is one such example. When I clicked this image, this is exactly what I thought, What are they hiding?
ReplyDeleteif they wish to protect it, why allow seeing from the eyes?
Seriously. It is just disappointing.
DeleteDilwara temple looks interesting.. I have been to Mysore palace and yes i was very disappointed with photography ban. Atleast they can charge separately for camera. By the way, one correction - sri kalahasthi is in Andhra pradesh and not in Tamilnadu.
ReplyDeleteExactly. Many places in India charge separately for Cams which is cool but total ban is disappointing.
DeleteUnlike our neighbors (Nepal), India does not make enough efforts to thrive on tourism.. although it's cultural diversity and mysticism attracts many people from all over the world... For some inane reasons, the tourism is only focused in small areas such as Leh/Ladakh (they have done a wonderful job to actually build a tourist focused industry) .. Goa .. Andamans.. and probably few more I am not able to recollect right now..
ReplyDeleteNot really. India does try to do everything to promote tourism, but then somewhere down the line they need to lift unnecessary bans to make those efforts to make some deep impact.
DeleteAs much as I would love to photograph all sites I visit, I believe preserving the site is more important.
ReplyDeleteFlash photography really destroys many art forms and there is no way to prevent it than banning cameras altogether, especially in countries like India.
Agreed some places need more care and are in danger due to flash photography and I would call those bans valid too. But I am pretty sure that is not the case with majority of the sites I posted here. But guess something we just can't change.
DeleteOmg, they tracked you down?! I don't understand why they restrict photography - it's not like we, the common people, would re-create the same structure and design in our backyard :-( I've been to Akshardham - it's incredibly amazing - and yeah, the only thing that reminded me of the place was the postcard that I bought from the shop.
ReplyDeleteI know right! Why the restriction is often so puzzling.
DeleteEven I make do with postcards for such place :(
Nice article...... Have been to Akshardham bt now will try to go to Kalhasti
ReplyDeleteSeems amazing place ......once again (it's a nice article)
Thanks Kashish...Hope you like Kalahasti when you go there :)
DeleteInteresting article. I agree with you these places should definitely be captured in cameras
ReplyDelete